What Every Medical College Website Must Disclose Under NMC Rules
Before you accept a faculty position — or even before you apply — a medical college's own website can tell you more than most people realise. NMC has now made a fairly detailed set of disclosures mandatory, and knowing what should be there makes it much easier to spot a college that isn't being transparent.
What every college website must now show
Required public disclosures
Under the latest PGMSR-2023 amendment, every medical college or institute is required to display the following on its official website, updated during the first week of every month:
- List of departments with available facilities
- List of PG courses along with the number of seats permitted by NMC
- List of faculty from the last three years — including current designation, date of joining, and date of leaving, with contact details
- Details of admitted students for the last three years
- Average daily OPD attendance for the previous year
- Average daily bed occupancy for the previous year
- Total major and minor surgeries performed in the previous year, by surgical department
NMC has also reserved the right to direct colleges to publish additional information beyond this list if the PGMEB deems it necessary.
Why the faculty list matters most if you're job-hunting
The three-year faculty history requirement is particularly useful. A college with high, visible faculty turnover — especially at senior designations — is worth asking direct questions about before you join. Conversely, a stable faculty list with long tenures is a reasonably good, quick signal about department culture and retention.

How to actually use this
Before applying anywhere, it's worth spending ten minutes checking whether the college's website actually has this information, and whether it looks current:
- If the faculty list hasn't been updated in over a month, that's a compliance gap worth noting — and possibly a broader signal about how the institution handles administrative obligations.
- Compare the number of PG seats listed against the faculty count for that department — NMC's faculty-to-student ratio norms mean these numbers should roughly track each other.
- A missing or incomplete disclosure page isn't just a paperwork issue — colleges that don't comply have already faced real penalties for similar disclosure failures around stipend payments.
What a compliant disclosure page actually looks like
In practice, a college meeting this requirement typically organises its disclosures under a clearly labelled section — often titled something like "Mandatory Disclosures," "NMC Compliance," or "Statutory Disclosures" — rather than scattering the required information across unrelated pages. If you're checking a college's site and can't easily locate this section within a couple of clicks from the homepage, that's itself a minor signal worth noting, even before you check whether the underlying data is current.
The requirement to update this information in the first week of every month also means the "last updated" date, where a college chooses to display one, is a useful quick check — a disclosure page that hasn't moved in several months despite this monthly update obligation suggests the college isn't treating the requirement as a routine administrative task.
What to do if the information looks inconsistent
If the numbers on a college's disclosure page look internally inconsistent — for instance, admitted student counts that don't align with the listed PG seat numbers, or OPD attendance figures that seem implausibly low for the college's stated bed capacity — that's worth treating as a flag rather than dismissing as a typo. Genuine data-entry errors happen, but a pattern of inconsistency across multiple disclosure categories is a reasonable signal to ask more pointed questions during your application process, or to verify independently before accepting an offer.
Frequently asked questions
Is this disclosure requirement specific to PG courses, or does it cover UG (MBBS) programmes too?
The requirement, introduced through the PGMSR-2023 amendment, is framed around postgraduate course disclosures specifically — PG seats, PG faculty history, and related PG-relevant operational data. Colleges may separately disclose UG-related information as part of good practice or other regulatory obligations, but this particular mandate's origin is the PG regulations.
What should I do if a college's disclosure page is missing or clearly outdated?
There's no independent penalty mechanism described specifically for job applicants to invoke — but it's reasonable to raise the gap directly with the college's administration during your application or interview process, and to factor it into your overall assessment of the institution's administrative discipline, alongside the compliance-penalty pattern NMC has already shown it's willing to enforce elsewhere (as with the recent stipend-disclosure penalties).
Does NMC actively check these disclosure pages, or is this a self-reporting requirement?
The notice reserves NMC's right to direct additional disclosures and treats this as an ongoing obligation, but it functions primarily as a self-reporting requirement colleges are expected to maintain on their own initiative — similar in spirit to the stipend-disclosure requirement that led to penalties when colleges failed to comply after repeated reminders.
The takeaway
This requirement exists to make medical colleges more transparent by default. Reading it before you apply, rather than after you've already joined, is the more useful order to do things in.